Two-wrongs don't mean a Left[!]

Too reads do not mean a dialogue. 

Mid-read(NFRY): (i.e. live footnoting)
Survival of the fittest verses(~) corporate species and arms races[!]
Battle of the Narratives? (Corporate offspring, peacocks and elk.)
(head or tails not treated equally, but...)[somewhat akin to gander or goose?]
[fundamental try-vergence]...(grain v ladder)[LOL read v regulations]
Survival of the Narratives?

4-3-16 to read:
The Atlantic: Obama Doctrine
4-4-16
Hedges/Hudson on Neo-Liberal Economics.

[related (b.s.): Spencer... demo/mice...DecomPart * Meantalizing]
*Moline's Platonics  / Darwinian Physics

Slash Segue

Michael Sandel: The lost art of democratic debate
And Criss-Classification
It is not about right or left but who* is the behind.

*please excuse the just(juxt)aposition of humor

---

For Sagans Sake: I will ungoogle the B. or link con tent:
(i.e. list of links above)
TED: Sandel as noted
Sandel/Soros
BookTV: Hedges on Class
New Yorker: Taleb
Jim Wallis(Sojourners) Sandel
BBC:Sit com? (no pun but Latin roots**)
Taleb Context
*
Asimov context
Mike Wallace: Ayn Rand
Embed(un) Pop Culture
Pre-Decartes or Aristotellian***?

**actual roots are(not) the spin on "darkest before the storm"

*** not to mention the B&A tangents not relinkeds(sp!)
[2-17-11 UPDATE:(not) Talk about a fifth sense? Yikes.]

Foo Wrappers

Hedges,
Giroux,
PC, ID ?
MetaPhysical
Alt Fray

Marco Pole Oh

FOOTNOTE PAGE TWO APRIL 2013

4-1-13: (b.s.) Fools - Pre-post-or-us? (sc), Swift Reading!(ow) (sc), Contempt for Courage, The Bully... (sc)

4-2-13 (b.s.)of sorts[!]?  Order actually read? The Treason of the Intellectuals, by Chris Hedges, Lessons From a Comeback, by Paul Krugman, Bush’s Economic Policies Bankrupted U.S., Reagan Budget Director Says, by Tracy Bloom on (David Stockman).

4-3-13 two too dimention? (b.s.) Fear and Running, It is about time...(sc), Dimentionalism(sic) (sc), Over Helming.(sc), Place Holder? (sc) (dimensionalism M-bed?)  Note.

$-$*-13: B4 I get too E-volved, I should note a few original intents, prior(a){i}^ two the heading I settled on. ^ o w [?]
[ Re: Too Evolved ? (b.s.): A, B. Fiddle Sticks^ , C, D. Primary Boogeyman, E. We Can't Wait, F. Following results. :/: ]

*cap or shift pun disKantinued
4-9-13 ** Re:Figure The resemblance to a stop sign is subtle but more symptomatic of a go sine.
4-15-13 From Bank to Bagel there is a lot to Un-M-bed.
4-16-13 "parsing": emphasis links
4-22-13: Careful what you S.F. (i.e. search 4? )
4-23-13 : darn may be closer.
"we+weave" /  A(sc), (b)...when first we practice..., C, (d)Oh, what a web..., E (Borrow and Twist- a surfing metaphor?), ]+[,  F, g, h, I(sc), J, K(sc), L(sc), M, N(sc)
"delta+dawn" / A(sc), B(sc), C(sc)
4-24-13 2nd line (sc)copy paste:  Pun it?, Game+Lock, Connecting the Dots, / , /, Filibuster Bluster*.
4-25-13 Not to bury the lede or G! (nor D, E, F?)
4-30-13 Pardon the Live chronism [!]

No Teddy

No Bully* Pulpit.
Disagreement and innovations.

Main Stream Perspectives:
CBS
ABC
PBS
Huffington Post
Salon
Washington Post
YouTube
Boston Globe
"Contensions?"(sic**)
More Follow Up.

[Mean-while up date*** No Rapture.]

* Mika 1 Joe 0 Are you serious, Joe?

** counter intuitive: Bully Pulpit is a good thing, like American Exceptionalism, unlike the link or the namesake.
*** and I did not see the Herman Cain link before my Teddy reference and there is no relation between my pen name LeRoy-Rogers and the therogersinsitute, nor Newt's middle name (Leroy).
[See ** "Are" yes I may be. Apologies for the multi-dimentionalism again, but in regards to Newt and Libertarianism, I think that it could be called Tea Party Nuance, and Ginrich is attempting to be the Obama of the Right(or the No Labels of the Right), while I am somewhere not between Keith Olbermann and Ed Schultz.]
[Profits verses Prophets(Chris Hedges) and more.

[The square of the esoteric.

Strauss on reading In 1952 Strauss published Persecution and the Art of Writing, commonly understood to advance the argument that some philosophers write esoterically in order to avoid persecution by political or religious authorities. A few readers of Strauss suggest esoteric writing may also seek to protect politics from political philosophy -- the explosive reasoning of which might well shatter fragile opinions undergirding the political order. Stemming from his study of Maimonides and Al Farabi, and then extended to his reading of Plato (he mentions particularly the discussion of writing in the Phaedrus), Strauss proposed that an esoteric text was the proper type for philosophic learning. Rather than simply outlining the philosopher's thoughts, the esoteric text forces readers to do their own thinking and learning. As Socrates says in the Phaedrus, writing does not respond when questioned, but invites a dialogue with the reader, thereby reducing the problems of the written word. One political danger Strauss pointed to was the acceptance of dangerous ideas too quickly by students. This was perhaps also relevant in the trial of Socrates, where his relationship with Alcibiades was used against him.

Ultimately, Strauss believed that philosophers offered both an "exoteric" or salutary teaching and an "esoteric" or true teaching, which was concealed from the general reader. For maintaining this distinction, Strauss is often accused of having written esoterically himself. Moreover he also emphasized that writers often left contradictions and other excuses to encourage the more careful examination of the writing. Leo Strauss's favourite novelist was Jane Austen.[5]

This spin off is from actually reading the previous bold "and more" but is relevant to the Gingrich "Exceptionalism" and Obama practical and incremental. And Platonic Dialogue.(sic)]
[Spell Check Gingrich: left Ginrich for link & search purposes: but note Strauss to Chomsky philosophical dynamism(Wittgenstein) via esoteric Tea Party Gingrich attempt at nuance.]

Generalization Warfare

[Posted 10-27-10]
and Characterizationalism.
Unmarketed forces.
What's Christopher Hedges' problem in this problematic read?
Class warfare? Liberal is not a class nor the answer.
VALUES ARE THE ANSWER and politics the process. Liberal as "object of public scorn"? Yes! But a word does not make an object, nor a class. Nor do they adequately describe the institutions of the church, press, academia or party.
Now... "low", "middle" and "upper class", may be a more proper use of terms, especially when it comes to labor, incomes or wealth and it is no more fair to blame the class as a whole. But it would seem that the middle-class bears the brunt of any blame if that is the game. Where were they when the so-called liberal class failed them? Satisfied with their progress and taking the liberals for granted, as well as the powers they thought they wielded. But warfare is not the right field of political correction.
[It may have been just over my head, but it seems a cheap shot at Chomsky.]

Yikes! 3.0

[Posted 2-7-11 PM]

I won't track the first two,(or last two here- or 4 ) but here is a back log of leaps.
Allow me to preface by saying that Rush Limbaugh is no* Glenn Beck, not to mention vice verses(sp!)...well...I don't know about that. But my the leap is not a vicious cycle or a virtuous cycle but a patronizing childish cycle.
And where is my leap? The Chomsky crack. And back to the future. These latter certainly need sorting.

* they have different formats and resources

[Christopher Hedges' language is too complex to un-nuance. Michael Sandel may need a second look. I have not finished either of these sources at this point.]

Toll Keen?

The Election March of the Trolls by Chris Hedges.
Myth Buster.

Loose thread and more on Obama's request for a Joint Session of Congress.

The Presidential Web: From Obama to Gore.


[update: "super" committee Missing Links]

Speaking of on the wall

Or Off it.
I drop two links here for pre-reference:

Everyone Should Pay Income Taxes:
It's bad for our democracy to exempt half the country. by Ari Fleischer / Wall Street Journal Or as The Week put it "Then more people would want less government spending."

And Tea Parties Forever by Paul Krugman / New York Times

Or Just Verses Not? OK they are both spin and I think I have spun it only slightly if at all hear here re: the weak.
My last crack might be off kilter but I am implying I know the spin on these verses and might support the latter over the former. It would only be fair not necessarily balanced to read them.
[OK, I am dizzy only glancing at the first few Ari paragraphs, (which I had previously not seen) as they were just about the spin and the flip-flop, so bingo and kudos to me. And a closer look at Krugman's Tea Parties Forever nails the MoveOn advice.]
[Some are fond of saying that you cannot tax corporations since costs will be passed bown, well deductions are also passed up, so I think that the balance has been (only) slightly struck. Nonetheless some points may be drawn from both pieces but not without more striking out into how work only trickles up and maybe money should not be treated as capital let alone a product or the point.]
[Not to mention the Triplex of Hitchens, Hartmann and Hedges or the rational middle? It is more likely the tri-pod of progress, or heart, hedge and hitch.]

[Update: 12-16-11 As The Week put it, link corrected. And Triplex amended.]

The LESS THAN pentagonal file:

to pun on circular file:
to be filed to reads.

Not read, yet glanced at, and filed in a particular order:^^
Dark Affinities: Liberal and Neoliberal
Each society determines which thoughts and feelings shall be permitted to arrive at the level of awareness and which have to remain unconscious. Just as there is a social character, there is also a "social unconscious."
- Eric Fromm  ^

Mike Lofgren | Gates Agonistes
"Eyeless in Gaza, at the mill with slaves."
– John Milton, Samson Agonistes

Chris Hedges | What Obama Really Meant Was...

Two Obama Lies Leave Little Room for Privacy Rights

And MORE THAN** TRIANGULAR FILE.

Caution: There may be quilting.

[Deep google of the day*]

*not every day nor maybe ever(hypospectral)

** lucky glance of the day ^
Gregory D. Johnsen wrote, "Maybe it shouldn't be so surprising that Congress didn't think about how the war would end when it passed the AUMF on Sept. 14, 2001, but after more than a dozen years, we are no closer to an answer."

^ (b.s.) sorted in reverse order:
z.- (s.c.) Pink Floyd ,
y.- (no Hoyle),
x.- Epicyclical Poet Tree, Fiddle Sticks^, c. , d. Update
w.- It's Obama's Turn, d. Are We "IN" Yet?, e. Stay the Comity of Course ...h. Notes from Al-Qaeda , l. I'm not a lawyer but... , s. FEINGOLD'S STAKE(a-s)

v.- Coordinary
u.- Coin-age of the day., Epicyclical Poet Tree, Relavent, Forward (Ironically)(a-d)

r.- The LESS THAN pentagonal file: Bury the lede? Too Random... (a-c)

Not my intent to be so geo-patch worked.  But to clarify a bit.  After my Neo-Platonic^^ primes of physics, psychology, philosophy and politics. Obama has his concerns as Commander-in-Chief, Leader of the Free World and facilitator of change, in the realm of economics and world pieces.  

^^ not that I am using the term correctly [!]

^  1-22-14 Not that I got there yet.
^^ 1-23-14 punctuation added

Forward (Ironically)

Original Heading: (FP!) Footnotes Page #? January 2014

1-15-14: Epicyclic Popperism, (b.s.*)Wittgenstein
(b.s.) Cultural Threads are Fine., ( b.s. pS.) A Tale of Two Manicheans.

Is politics the philosophy of action? 
Everyone has a philosophy, not everyone has a politics. And where does this come from?
[["Life is the content in context **."]]
[["** Is this line the Hitch or Hedge hiker?"]]

*(blog search)
** Epicyclical Poet Tree It may turn out, that I am demonstrating and practicing P'.(although like a lot of material I have yet to finish reading, that may be P^.)

P^ ~ found under "hiker" Knot 2B Phun Knee^, nor Phields ofor Phootballs. Nor to be a PhD.
^ Ctrl F: chef

P' ~ found under con' of "content"= The Vital Usefulness of Popperism
P^ = Philosophy Now: "Philosophy, it seems, currently has three main avenues, which, though clogged, it tries to flow through. One is academic philosophy, which is, one gathers, largely mired in esoteric analysis or self-referential in-house debates. Another might collectively be called ‘street philosophy’. It wants to be some modern version of ancient Greek marketplace philosophy, but the correspondence doesn’t stick. The third realm is ‘hidden philosophy’, held non-publicly by individuals whose intellect and values funnel out into practice and postures seen and unseen, burbling out in things like voting, how a person feels he or she has been educated, and what the zeitgeist in the public square is like."
Knot 2 mention ADD. POP Art. Schopenhauer, Young, Dantos, Dent.<>

<> GPS  Coin-age of the day. Over Helming. (USC), Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications. (sea)

Hiker pun on Chris-to-pher hoods, Hitchens and Hedges.
Oar actually hitch / hedge / Hood?

[Note: Facetious Time Stamp 2014]

NOTE: (sc) original heading = date of post  / UPD8: Save for study.

Hanging Chad

6-5-15
Hedges
/
Clinton
'n
Tan \*
Gents
or pal a dins ? 

* David Brin paladins?
\ ~ docu Social Darwinism 2.0[!]

O W ?  <- a="">  game of surfs ? [!]

[fb court ?]

6-16-15 : SPOILER ALERT  (OW) Police M~US?
S.A. 2. oh [?]: A. NEWSROOM, B.Buy In or Sell Out  C. D. Just a Position  E. Juxta-Boogey